Fact Check

Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' does not give president power to delay or cancel elections

Provisions that would make it harder for judges to enforce rulings were struck by the Senate parliamentarian before the bill was passed.

by Jack Izzo, Published May 31, 2025 Updated July 14, 2025


Image courtesy of Getty Images


Claim:
H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, contains a provision allowing the U.S. president to delay or cancel elections.
Rating:
False

About this rating


On May 22, 2025, Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill, H.R. 1, attempting to turn some of U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda into law. Trump called the piece of legislation "One big, beautiful bill," which was adopted into the bill's unofficial name, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

The bill underwent a lot of changes, passing the House by just one vote. It had then faced major pushback from Democrats and even some Republicans in the Senate, but Vice President JD Vance broke a tie to send the bill to Trump's desk. He signed it into law on July 4.

Posts on social media sites like Facebook, Instagram and Reddit claimed the measure went even further than as drafted, alleging that the bill contained a provision that would allow the president to "delay or cancel elections — legally."

 

 
 
 
 
 
View this post on Instagram
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

A post shared by Gov't. Reform Now! (@impeach.the.imposters)


Snopes carefully reviewed the mammoth bill looking for provisions that would match that description. There were none — therefore, the claim is false. 

The bill's table of contents provides a brief description of what each section does. 

As examples:

Nothing in the bill's table of contents even appeared remotely like it would give the president power to delay or cancel elections.

If such a provision were hidden in the bill, it would have to contain either the word "president" or "executive," since that's who the power would supposedly go to. But searching the bill for those keywords also turned up nothing relevant. 

The term "president" came up 15 times in the bill, on topics as broad as radio frequency ranges, to Medicaid eligibility, to presidential protection, but never in relation to elections. The term "executive" came up 26 times, mostly in relation to government departments with the word in their name, but again, never in relation to elections.


By Jack Izzo

Jack Izzo is a Chicago-based journalist and two-time "Jeopardy!" alumnus.


Source code