In March 2025, a series of viral videos claimed a judge attempted to fine U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi for wearing a religious symbol — a cross necklace — in a courtroom, but she stopped him by citing laws that protect her. The most popular clip showed Bondi facing the justice, supposedly named "Judge Prescott," with a caption that claimed:
Pam Bondi walked into court expecting a routine hearing — until Judge Prescott fined her for wearing a cross. What happened next turned a simple case into a legal showdown that had the entire courtroom watching. Pam refused to back down, challenging the judge's ruling in real time and exposing the flaw in his argument.
But the fight didn't end there. The next day, Prescott struck back, filing a formal complaint against her, hoping to silence her through the system. What he didn't expect? Pam was ready for him. As the story gained traction, legal experts, journalists, and the public weighed in, putting the judge under intense scrutiny.
Would he get away with his actions, or was this the moment his power began to crumble? Watch the full story to find out how Pam turned the tables in a battle that went far beyond one courtroom.
At least one video amended the story slightly by changing the name of the purported judge and city where the incident supposedly took place, and displayed different visuals. However, most videos repeated the story transcribed above with the same visuals, as seen here:
According to all videos, the situation took place in Florida.
The fictional story played on the fact that Bondi often wears the cross in public. That said,
Furthermore, the videos displayed several signs of having been generated by artificial intelligence software. One clip showed an AI-generated image of Bondi alongside the purported judge and depicted her mouth and body moving in a stilted manner. However, Bondi's voice was not audible, and a narrator spoke throughout the video. People in the background of that
The stories presented on this channel are entirely fictional and crafted solely for entertainment. Any resemblance to real events, individuals, or situations is purely coincidental and unintentional. These narratives are not intended to depict, reference, or represent any actual occurrences, persons, or entities.
Snopes has previously debunked similar YouTube videos with fake stories about prominent people as well as clips that used AI technology for audio or visuals and published a series of articles to help people identify that type of media.
